Back to directory
Uptime Kuma logo

Uptime Kuma

Self-hosted uptime monitor with status pages, alerting integrations, and a simple operations dashboard.

Reviewed as open-source web infrastructure for operator control, portability, privacy posture, and EU deployment fit.

Assessment summary

Best fit

Small teams that need practical service monitoring and public status pages without a managed monitoring vendor.

Watch points

Large fleets may need stronger role management, alert routing, and long-term metrics retention elsewhere.

Score breakdown

Criterion-level evidence used for this review record.

85/100

15/15License

Open rights and license

MIT is the listed open-source license in the public project materials.

15/18Self-host

Self-hostability and runtime independence

Uptime Kuma has public source and self-managed deployment paths; score reflects the expected operating footprint for monitoring.

13/16Data

Data control and portability

A self-hosted deployment keeps primary data under operator control, with migration and backup quality depending on the deployment design.

10/12Privacy

Privacy by default and telemetry control

Privacy posture depends on configuration, telemetry, retention, and integration choices documented or implied by the public project materials.

7/8Interop

Interoperability and open standards

The project exposes standard web, API, protocol, or integration surfaces appropriate to monitoring.

11/14Ops

Operational resilience and maintainability

The score reflects maintenance burden, release maturity, and the operational complexity implied by running this class of software.

10/12EU fit

EU hosting and procurement fit

It can be deployed in an EU-controlled environment; procurement fit still depends on support, contracts, accessibility, and hosting choices.

4/5Governance

Governance and supply-chain clarity

Ownership and development are publicly visible through the linked project materials, but governance depth should be reviewed before procurement.

Review notes

Seed listing for the Sovereign Web Stack catalog. Treat this score as an evidence-backed starting point: contributors should improve it with more specific public links, deployment notes, security posture, export documentation, and governance evidence as the index matures.

Methodology note

This project is scored against the public Sovereign Web Stack methodology. Review the full scoring model before comparing tools across categories.

Open methodologySubmit project evidence