A scored directory for open-source web infrastructure: analytics, identity, CMS, forms, search, monitoring, support, and collaboration tools ranked by how much control they leave with the operator.
Privacy-first web analytics with a self-hostable single-binary path and managed EU/US cloud option.
Teams that want website analytics, goals, funnels, ecommerce, search visibility, AI visibility, and exports without operating a database cluster.
Cloud maturity and ecosystem integrations should be reviewed over time as the hosted offering grows.
Open-source identity and access management with standards-based SSO, OIDC, and SAML.
Organizations that need self-controlled identity infrastructure with standard federation support.
Identity is critical infrastructure; operations, upgrades, backups, and incident response must be treated seriously.
Mature open-source web analytics platform with self-hosted and managed options.
Organizations that need a long-running GA-style analytics suite with many integrations and established compliance documentation.
The broader feature surface and PHP/MySQL operations model can be heavier than smaller analytics tools.
Self-hostable file sync, collaboration, and office ecosystem for organizations that need data control.
Teams that need controlled file sharing, collaboration, and user-facing productivity services.
A broad app ecosystem can increase maintenance, update, and hardening work.
Self-hosted newsletter and mailing-list manager with a compact Go application and PostgreSQL.
Organizations that want to own subscriber lists and campaigns without outsourcing newsletter data.
Email deliverability still depends on SMTP provider, DNS reputation, and list hygiene.
Lightweight privacy-focused analytics with open-source self-hosting and a commercial cloud service.
Teams that want a simple dashboard, small tracking script, and strong privacy messaging.
Self-hosting has a multi-service footprint; some teams may prefer managed cloud for routine operations.
Open-source helpdesk and support system with self-hosted and hosted options.
Support teams that need ticket ownership, email workflows, and controlled customer data.
Support data is sensitive; access control, backups, and email security are critical.
Open-source survey and form platform with self-hosting and managed cloud.
Teams that need controlled surveys, feedback, and product research workflows.
Survey data can be sensitive; retention, access control, and hosting region need review.
Self-hosted uptime monitoring with status pages and common notification integrations.
Small teams and operators that need a simple owned uptime monitor.
For large estates, governance, HA, and alerting depth may require a more formal monitoring platform.
Open-source web analytics with a simple product surface and managed cloud option.
Small teams that want a familiar analytics dashboard and can operate a Node.js app with a supported SQL database.
The self-hosted path depends on an external database and the hosted product is separate from your infrastructure choices.
Open-source search engine designed for fast site and app search experiences.
Teams that want to run their own search backend for documentation, catalogs, and product data.
Managed cloud convenience may be attractive; evaluate data residency and operational needs.
Data platform and headless CMS that layers APIs and admin UI over SQL databases.
Teams that want an admin UI and APIs on top of their own database schema.
Review licensing, hosted features, and the governance model because source availability is not the same as a permissive OSS license.
Open-source headless CMS for building content APIs and editorial workflows.
Teams that want a familiar Node.js CMS with API-first content delivery.
Enterprise features and plugin choices can shape the real sovereignty posture.
Broad product analytics and feature platform with open-source roots and a commercial cloud.
Product teams that need event analytics, feature flags, experiments, replay, and broader product intelligence.
The broad platform surface creates more operational and governance complexity than focused web analytics tools.
Digital sovereignty is not the same as buying from a local vendor. The index looks for control surfaces an operator can verify: source rights, self-hosting, export, telemetry control, standards support, operational maintainability, EU deployment fit, and governance clarity.
The model is intentionally public so projects can challenge evidence, improve their posture, or submit clearer documentation. Scores are a review aid, not a certification.
The scoring lens is informed by EU open-source, interoperability, digital rights, data portability, and cyber-resilience materials.
The index is designed so contributors can submit project descriptions, evidence links, logos, and score breakdowns in a separate source repository.